Responding to a recent column in Moshe Kurtz’s “Unpacking the Iggerot” series, Yitzchak Blau draws our attention to a difference of tone and orientation between rabbis Moshe Feinstein and Yechiel Yaakov Weinberg concerning celebrating a Bat Mitzva and the induction of young women into serious and mature Jewish life and learning.

The kashrut status of dishwashers and the propriety of Bat Mitzva ceremonies have absolutely nothing to do with each other, right? Ostensibly, that may be true. But, Moshe Kurtz digs below the surface to identify the common theme that emerges from this odd pairing of topics addressed by R. Moshe Feinstein in a short, yet iconic responsum.

R. Moshe Feinstein stood as a bulwark against innovations of liberal movements, delineating the borders between acceptable and unacceptable halakhic practice. His opposition to Bat Mitzva ceremonies is an iconic case in point. In this installment of "Unpacking the Iggerot," Moshe Kurtz shows us that behind this social issue lies a fascinating debate about the nature of how R. Feinstein chose what and when he wanted the public to read from his literature.

How far does one need to go to fast on Yom Kippur? R. Moshe Feinstein was asked not how to be exempted from fasting, but how can we make ourselves obligated? Moshe Kurtz takes us on a tour of several responsa with relevance for the upcoming holidays and demonstrates R. Feinstein’s broader approach to the role of artificial intervention in the halakhic process and a life motivated by joy of mitzvot.